FAIR Christians for Fair Witness on the
Middle East
WITNESS 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 1960
New York, New York
10115
(212) 870-2320
www.christianfairwitness.com
Factual
Errors and Significant Omissions in Jimmy
Carter’s “Palestine” Part II
4.
By using the term “apartheid,” President
Carter more than implies a comparison between the racist South African policy
and Israeli Policies in the Territories.
There is No Analogy Between
Policies Like Apartheid and Israeli Self-Defense
• Israeli policies in the Palestinian Territories such as
construction of the security barrier and checkpoints cannot reasonably be
analogized to apartheid. They were
instituted as a passive defense against suicide bombing and other forms of
terrorism that had become almost daily realities in Israel after September 2000.
It is tragic that there are innocent
Palestinians who suffer under a system of security barriers and checkpoints.
However, instead of condemning Israelis for trying to protect themselves from
the barbarity of suicide bombing, Palestinian terrorists must be held
accountable for the consequences of their behavior.
Prior to the 2d Intifada
Palestinians Moved Freely Inside the Territories and Israel
• Israel did not create checkpoints or the barrier to
humiliate or harm Palestinians. Beginning on September 29, 2000, Israel had
been under a constant siege of terrorist attacks. Terrorists began crossing
over from the West Bank into Israel killing and maiming hundreds of innocent
civilians in suicide attacks. They used
ambulances to smuggle themselves and weapons into Israel, they hid explosive
belts inside computers, musical instrument cases, and clothes chests. They
exploited women and children by using them to execute terror attacks. Faced
with the threats posed by these and other activities, Israel had no choice but
to build and operate checkpoints and a security barrier designed to prevent
terrorists from penetrating into Israel.
• Israel has repeatedly eased restrictions on Palestinians
in the Territories whenever the violence temporarily subsides and only in
response to renewed violence or credible threats has tightened them again.
Israelis Just
Like Any Other People Have the Right to Protect Themselves
From Suicide
Bombing And Other Forms of Terrorism
Without Being Accused of Being Racists
5.
President Carter repeatedly mentions
Security Council Resolution 242, which called for return of captured
territories in exchange for peace, recognition, and secure borders, but gives
the impression that it was Israel that violated this Resolution.
• Immediately after the Six Day War, Israel tried to open
negotiations and exchange land for peace treaties with its Arab neighbors,
normalization of relations and guarantee of navigation through the Straits of
Tiran. But the League of Arab States
(eight Arab heads of state) had a summit conference in Khartoum, Sudan, August
29 - September 1, 1967, where it adopted the dictum of the “Three NOs” with respect to Israel: NO peace with Israel, NO recognition of
Israel and NO negotiations with Israel.
• In 1979 the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt
established sovereignty and recognized borders. In exchange for peace with Egypt, Israel withdrew from the Sinai
in 1982. It was Egypt that declined to
re‑assume possession of the Gaza Strip, leaving it under Israeli
control. When Israel signed a peace
treaty with Jordan in 1994 they also
established legal and recognized borders
Jordan also specifically ceded any right or claim to the West Bank and
East Jerusalem at that time, leaving it under Israeli control.
• In the summer of 2000 at Camp David, Israeli P.M. Barak
offered the Palestinians four clusters of territory on the West Bank. Yasser
Arafat made no counteroffer, walked out of the Summit, and the Second Intifada
began. Five months later, President Clinton crafted a final proposal whereby
the Palestinians would get all of Gaza and 97 percent of contiguous West Bank
territory, with East Jerusalem for a capital. The Palestinians rejected this
offer as well, making the implementation of Resolution 242 impossible.
6.
President Carter faults Israel for its
administration of Christian and Muslim religious sites.
• In stark contrast to
its neighbors, Israel has been scrupulous about allowing access to both
Christian and Muslim holy sites, consistent of course, with security needs.
Between 1948 and 1967 when Jordan occupied the West Bank and East Jerusalem,
the Jordanians destroyed and desecrated Jewish religious sites and did not
allow Jews to pray at the Western Wall.
But within days after Israel gained control of East Jerusalem through
the 6-Day War, Moshe Dayan gave control of the Temple Mount and the Dome of the
Rock to the Waqf, the Muslim religious body that has the oversight of mosques
and holy sites, in spite of the fact that the Temple Mount is also the site of
the First and Second Temples -- Judaism’s holiest site.
Jimmy Carter’s Need to Distort the Facts is Disturbing
What Motivated the Former President to Repeatedly and
Egregiously Misrepresent
the Relevant History and
Facts and Blame Only Israel for
the Violence in
the Middle East?